For a while, I've been pondering about North America's obesity problem. I've watched a few shows like Jamie Oliver's School Dinners that point to our diets as being a big part of the obesity problem. One of the conclusions he had come up with was that generally speaking, it's more expensive to eat healthy. Therefore, it's an economic disincentive to eat healthy, and people on the lower rungs of the economic ladder will have a harder time getting healthy food.
Case in point. You go to a McDonalds, and you can get a Big Mac Meal with fries and a drink, or a chicken salad for the same price. In terms of value, the Big Mac meal seems more appealing and filling. That got me thinking, why is it that junk food and such is cheaper than wholesome real food?
I came across a blog with an article entitled, "
Why Eating a Big Mac is Cheaper than Eating a Salad"
We’ve all heard the figures. We know that meat production uses significantly more land and fossil fuel resources than a vegetarian diet. But, then, why on earth is it cheaper to eat meat than fresh fruit and vegetables?
The following graph will give you an idea. On the right we have Federal Dietary Recommendations, compared with, on the left, the government subsidies that prop up the respective food groups.
Almost 75% of U.S. government subsidies go into meat and dairy production, but less than half a per cent goes into fruit and vegetable production. Talk about an upside down world!